Hi Dave, yes, they can be. But it really depends on the specific funding opportunity – which is the main purpose of the grant. As long as the grant achieves this goal, funding can support a 508-compliant website, in whole or in part. If you have any further questions, we recommend that you contact the funding body of the respective grant or cooperation agreement, as we are not able to answer this question in a binding manner. Hi Johnnie, you need to look for federal grants and then apply. Please read this article that goes through this process and links to other places to look for: blog.grants.gov/2016/06/22/exploring-eligibility-individuals-seeking-grants-for-house-repairs/ In general, “substantial participation” refers to the extent to which federal employees directly perform or implement parts of the rewards program. In the case of a grant, the federal government maintains a stricter oversight and oversight role. Through a cooperative arrangement, federal employees are then more involved in the implementation of the program. When you read “cooperative,” don`t forget to work “side by side.” The specific way in which this participation is integrated varies depending on the programme and the agency. Beneficiaries of a cooperation agreement must apply for and obtain prior authorization to hold a conference.
This may impact research activities, including proposed working group meetings, roundtables and focus groups that meet the definition of a “conference” under DOJ guidelines. See “Conference Approval, Planning and Reporting” in the JUP Financial Guide. The distinction between grants and cooperation agreements is based on the existence or absence of substantial participation. In research activities, significant involvement is likely if a federal employee supports, directs, coordinates or actively participates in the project. This essential involvement most often consists of either (1) managing the allocation of resources between sub-projects, sites or institutions, or (2) actively participating in the conduct of the research. Normal supervision and stewardship is not a material implication. A cooperation agreement is a type of project in which joint action or cooperation between the federal contracting authority and the beneficiary during the implementation of the project is considered necessary or desirable to ensure the successful implementation of the project. Federal Grant and Cooperation Agreements Act of 1977 (P.L. 95-224, 31 USC 6301 et seq.) defines the fundamental distinctions between government procurement, subsidies, and cooperation agreements.
Cooperation agreements and grants “transfer anything of value from the federal procurement agency or intermediary entity to the non-federal entity to serve a public purpose.” When the EPA, usually the project officer, is involved in project activities, a cooperation agreement is the right funding mechanism. This is a scam. You never have to pay a fee for a federal grant, especially a grant you didn`t apply for. Please read this article: blog.grants.gov/2016/06/28/answers-to-your-grant-fraud-questions/ No significant participation between the NIJ and the winner is expected for the grants. The beneficiary is required to cooperate with the grant manager of the assigned NIJ, who is the authorized representative of the NIJ responsible for the proper administration of the grant. If the Fellow also decides to hire NIJ scientists for contributions and advice on substantive issues related to the grant (e.B instrument review, translation of field results, suggestion of publication locations), the Fellow may access the NIJ Fellows at no cost to the grant. If you would like more detailed information about grants and cooperation agreements, here are some additional resources: There are many differences between supply contracts and grants. The following table lists a number of them and can help you define the instrument you want to apply for. In the case of cooperation agreements, significant participation between the NIJ and the winner is expected. The recipient must work with the assigned NIJ Grant Manager, who is the authorized representative of the NIJ responsible for the proper administration of the scholarship. In addition, a NIJ scientist will be assigned to work with the laureate`s researchers on substantive issues related to the prize – support, guidance, coordination and participation in project activities to ensure the winner`s success.
The NIJ scientist may also publish and present with the beneficiary`s researchers as representatives of the NIJ. A cooperation agreement “differs from a grant in that it provides for substantial participation between the federal procurement or transmitting agency and the non-federal agency in carrying out the activity provided for in the federal surtax.” Now the question arises as to what it means to have “substantial involvement” by the federal government. The distinguishing factor between a grant and a cooperation agreement is the degree of participation or participation of the Confederation in the implementation of the work activities. [Note 1] Substantial participation means that after the award, scientific or program staff support, direct, coordinate or participate in project activities. In general, responsibility for the continued implementation of the funded project rests with the recipient in the implementation of the funded and approved proposal and budget, as well as award conditions. The NIJ is responsible for monitoring and, if necessary, realigning the project. That being said, substantial participation is a relative rather than an absolute concept. NIJ`s participation in a collaborative project depends on the circumstances. Examples include the NIJ`s review and approval of the winners` implementation, monitoring and evaluation plans; Review and approval of the NIJ, which is required after the completion of one phase of the work, before moving on to the next phases; Review and approval by the NIJ of subcontracts or sub-licenses; and joint action and cooperation or participation between the NIJ and the laureate in the implementation of certain technical activities related to the implementation of the funded project. This cooperation is programmatic in nature and may offer benefits (e.B. technical and professional expertise) that would otherwise not be available to the beneficiary. Ultimately, cooperation agreements provide support and create relationships between the organisations and the promoter in which both parties jointly pursue specific objectives or activities.
Within the framework of a cooperation agreement, the NIJ is a strong partner in research efforts. Are the websites funded in whole or in part by grants or cooperative arrangements that are subject to the requirements of FISMA, section 508 of the Privacy Act and the related OMB memorandum, such as OMB Memo M-17-06? In the case of grants, there is usually only a very low level of federal involvement in data collection. Therefore, review and approval of the PRA is generally not required. However, there are exceptions if the collection of information as part of a federal grant is considered “carried out or sponsored” by an organization. The PRA applies to grants only if: Cooperation agreements and grants are “a legal instrument of financial support between a federal procurement agency or intermediary institution and a non-federal entity” within the meaning of the OMB Uniform Guidelines (§ 200.24 for cooperation agreements and § 200.51 for grant agreements). Sellers and fellows establish binding relationships with the government – and they must abide by the terms of the supply contract or financial support. If the objective of the funded activity is to support or stimulate activities that do not serve the direct benefit of the Confederation, a support agreement (grant or cooperation agreement) may be used. Federal agencies use procurement contracts and various forms of financial support (grants, cooperation agreements and others) to transfer funds to individuals and organizations to accomplish the organization`s authorized mission. The NIJ may, at its sole discretion, award grants in the form of grants or cooperation agreements. Although many of you are familiar with grants, you may not be as familiar with cooperation agreements. Cooperation agreements are just another tool to support high-quality crime and justice research.
The cooperation agreements allow us to fully exploit the expertise of NIJ scientists and support innovative research. The following table shows some of the key differences and similarities between these two financing options. It should be noted that the FGCAA is not the legal authority with which the EPA finances aid agreements. The EPA`s legal powers derive from environmental laws (Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, etc.). A cooperation agreement can be a highly specialized research award in which federal employees are among the few experts in the field. In this case, the award can be defined as a “cooperation agreement” because federal staff and the non-federal recipient will conduct the research together in one way or another. Thank you very much for trying so hard to get subsidies to get a disabled car, we are on disability. Here, for example, is a cooperation agreement of the Geological Survey (USGS) of the Ministry of the Interior. This is a joint funding opportunity for research and technical assistance, which is provided in the form of a cooperation agreement and not a grant.
The winner will work closely with USGS staff and researchers to improve skills in high-performance scientific computing and scientific visualization through research into new scientific computing tools, methods and techniques for large-scale data management. With a grant, the fellow has a high degree of autonomy. .